Do you know the ways to write weak introductions? Are you afraid to do it or are you just trying to avoid writing poor introductions as much as possible for your own good? Well, it’s better to be aware of poorly written introductions than to know nothing at all.
Do you want to write poor introductions? You know, for those times when you want to show how bad you really suck. Oh yeah, make sure you don’t use typing verification software later either.
Mislead readers. Give them an introduction that raises expectations… for a different kind of piece than the one you’ve written. For example, he implies that your essay will prove that the world is made of cotton candy, but he spends the rest of the paragraphs offering conjectures based on non-tangible evidence and punitive arguments that the world is made of chocolates. That always works wonders.
Keep it underdeveloped. Write your introduction in such a way that any point you give is meaningless unless the reader gets to the middle of the work. The mystery is intriguing, by the way, so give them ideas that they won’t develop until much later. It will keep them hanging (themselves, out of frustration, that is).
Make sure the reader can’t understand it. Make sure the introduction is not self-explanatory. Without looking at the title or the following paragraphs, your readers should not be able to tell what ideas you are trying to communicate. That is art in motion.
Give it a bad focus. Add a random collection of facts that readers may not understand in your introduction. The confusion makes them want to keep reading. It is true.